Somehow I had the impression that http://trac.macports.org/ticket/126
was implemented in registry 2.0.
My mistake...
Le 15/04/10 16:22, Joshua Root a écrit :
On 2010-4-15 15:35 , Eric Le Lay wrote:
Hi,
I don't care about naming.
As long as it's updated timely (that's when I notice that gnome-python
2.28 is out since Mars 30 and I must update the portfile :-) ).
To my mind, there shouldn't even be 2 ports but 2 variants.
I can't wait for registry 2.0.
You can use registry2.0 right now in trunk. How does it help with this
particular problem?
- Josh
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
