On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2011, at 17:44, [email protected] wrote: > > > Revision: 75466 > > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/75466 > > Author: [email protected] > > Date: 2011-01-25 15:44:17 -0800 (Tue, 25 Jan 2011) > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > New port: gtk3 > > Isn't this based on the gtk2 port? If so, you should have "svn copy"'d the > gtk2 port and then made changes. That way, the "svn log" and "svn blame" > output of gtk3 would have been more useful. > You're right -- I always forget to do that. :( Is it worth "svn rm"ing the port, "svn copy"ing it, and recommitting?
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
