(I'm remembering to Cc the list this time) On Jan 25, 2011, at 22:10, David Baumgold wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Isn't this based on the gtk2 port? If so, you should have "svn copy"'d the >> gtk2 port and then made changes. That way, the "svn log" and "svn blame" >> output of gtk3 would have been more useful. > > You're right -- I always forget to do that. :( Is it worth "svn rm"ing the > port, "svn copy"ing it, and recommitting? The gtk3 port is over 200 lines long, and the gtk2 port has over 8 years of history. I think we will appreciate later having that history easily available to us in the gtk3 port, to explain why those lines say what they say. I would recommend "svn rm"ing and then recreating it with "svn cp". _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
