On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 03:44, Clemens Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:28:48PM -0400, Arno Hautala wrote: >> >> I think the GSOC project that would introduce "rev-upgrade" >> could be of use here. It could at least mark decencies after >> compilation has occurred. > > It currently does not do that, but will detect broken binaries and > rebuild the port (in this case without the auto-variant enabled).
Yeah, I mispoke. I didn't think rev-upgrade _would_ detect missing dependencies, just that it _could_ be used to that end. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 03:58, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, the post-destroot-check is intended to find this kind of hidden > dependencies and report them. Introducing dependencies automatically > without manual interaction isn't really possible as it requires changes > to the Portfile which might be too complex for an automated task to > succeed. So this should be left to the maintainer. That's a better solution as these issues really should be corrected in the Portfile anyway. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 04:21, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's also trace mode which will prevent non-dependencies from being used. Even better news. I do remember hearing about trace mode. And I think I recall that the goal is to always enable it? Sheesh, is it really Monday morning? -- arno s hautala /-| [email protected] pgp b2c9d448 _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
