On 2011-10-19 08:53 , Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 20:41, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +license wxWindow Licence 3.1 >> >> That's not the format licenses should be listed in. Using "port info --index >> --license license:wx" to see what other ports are using for this license, >> you probably want to write "license wxWindows-3.1" > > I put that as a placeholder before adding wxwidgets to licenses, I > forgot and I didn't notice when committing. > > By the way I see that Joshua removed conflicts on r85188 but being > wxwidgets 3.1 just lpgl 3.1 with a few notice shouldn't it conflict > the same way lgpl-3.1?
There's no such thing as LGPL-3.1 at this time. The "wxWindows Library Licence, Version 3.1" is LGPL-2+ plus an exception that says you can distribute binaries of derivative works under any license you like. It's hard to see how that could ever prevent us from distributing binaries of anything. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
