On 2011-10-19 21:09 , Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:22, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: >> There's no such thing as LGPL-3.1 at this time. > > Correct, replace lgpl-3.1 with lgpl-3 > >> The "wxWindows Library >> Licence, Version 3.1" is LGPL-2+ plus an exception that says you can >> distribute binaries of derivative works under any license you like. > > Actually it's our choice to pick: > " either version 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version"
Yes, that's what LGPL-2+ means. >> It's hard to see how that could ever prevent us from distributing binaries of >> anything. > > I'm not making my point clear: since wxwidgets is lgpl-3 _and_ lgpl is > already listed as conflicting with gpl-1 and gpl-2 shouldn't we add > wxwidgets as conflicting with gpl-1 and gpl-2 as well? It is not LGPL-3. Even if it was, the extra exception removes the conflicts. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
