On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > We've already had a lengthy discussion about subports, variants, or > everything in one port. subports would be a fine way to go, if it was desired > to have separately installable ports. It sounded like Mark didn't think that > would be of advantage, and because of #16373 it would be of disadvantage > because the source, which is around 370MB, would have to be checked out from > the project's repository twice.
... which could be worked around by just making a tarball of the source that should be built (which is preferred over fetching the source via cvs/svn/git/whatever anyway) -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
