On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> We've already had a lengthy discussion about subports, variants, or >> everything in one port. subports would be a fine way to go, if it was >> desired to have separately installable ports. It sounded like Mark didn't >> think that would be of advantage, and because of #16373 it would be of >> disadvantage because the source, which is around 370MB, would have to be >> checked out from the project's repository twice. > > > ... which could be worked around by just making a tarball of the source that > should be built (which is preferred over fetching the source via > cvs/svn/git/whatever anyway) > > -- > Daniel J. Luke > > +========================================================+ > > | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | > > | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | > > +========================================================+ > > | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | > > | reflect the opinions of my employer. | > > +========================================================+ > > > > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
I don't follow you; are you saying to tarball after fetching from svn? What do you do with it then? Mark _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
