On 2012-6-15 00:34 , Michael Dickens wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> Shouldn't 5.0 be called qt5-mac? > > Yes, I guess it should! Good catch. I wonder if there will be a Qt 4.9 > offering (or even 4.8.3 beta), which would then require qt4-mac-devel > again? Can I force qt4-mac-devel to upgrade to qt4-mac, at least > temporarily?
Sure, just make it replaced_by qt4-mac. Or you could just update it to the same version, which would mean users with -devel installed would still get the next beta if there ends up being one. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
