> I think I'd prefer to push folks using qt4-mac-devel to using qt4-mac, > so I'll try the "replaced_by" & revbump path. Later on, I assume I can > remove the "replace_by", do another revbump (or version up), and have > qt4-mac-devel be fresh and new again?
Yes, the only difference being no on will be upgrading to it--they'll have to install -devel like they did when it first became available.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
