On 08/16/2012 05:47 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 16, 2012, at 16:34, [email protected] wrote:Revision: 96665 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96665 Author: [email protected] Date: 2012-08-16 14:34:33 -0700 (Thu, 16 Aug 2012) Log Message: ----------- subversion: version bump to 1.7.6 + patch to only build mod_dontdothat when building mod_dav_svn, and convert perlbindings port to use subports for each perl version (fixes #32694)Would it maybe be appropriate to name the perl and python bindings ports to match how regular perl and python modules are named? p5.8-subversionbindings p5.10-subversionbindings p5.12-subversionbindings p5.14-subversionbindings p5.16-subversionbindings py24-subversionbindings py25-subversionbindings py26-subversionbindings py27-subversionbindings
I was thinking we leave the subversion-python2?bindings alone, rename py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn because that's the real name of the package. In a year, rename subversion-python2?bindings to py2?-svn. Isn't the name of the package supposed to follow py2?-, even if it has 'py' in it?
I was going to do the py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn rename soon. Blair _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
