On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Blair Zajac <[email protected]> wrote: > I was thinking we leave the subversion-python2?bindings alone, rename > py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn because that's the real name of the package. In a > year, rename subversion-python2?bindings to py2?-svn. Isn't the name of the > package supposed to follow py2?-, even if it has 'py' in it? > > I was going to do the py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn rename soon.
That sounds reasonable to me, the subversion-perlbindings ports should probably become p5.?-svn (even though it doesn't install a SVN.pm). I was originally going to (attempt to) use sub-ports for all of the subversion bindings ports (so there would just be one portfile to edit for version bumps), but I don't think that's going to work with using the perl portgroup... -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
