On 2012-8-30 05:22 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > I was not suggesting to drop the 25 and 27 subports. > > The list thread "handle only subports install files" is where you > "discouraged" (my words) useless top-level ports: > On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> Again, why have a useless top-level port in the first place?
In that case it was useless because trying to install it threw an error. But anyway, why bring this up against this specific port submission when every unified python port works the same way? - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
