On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-8-30 05:22 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> >> I was not suggesting to drop the 25 and 27 subports. >> >> The list thread "handle only subports install files" is where you >> "discouraged" (my words) useless top-level ports: >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >>> Again, why have a useless top-level port in the first place? > > In that case it was useless because trying to install it threw an error. > But anyway, why bring this up against this specific port submission when > every unified python port works the same way?
You are a MacPorts manager and this sounded like a directive. On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > If you can't decide which one to declare > at the top level, roll dice or something. It is now clear to me that there is no problem with a stub port used as a "subport container". Thanks for clearing this up for me. Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
