On 2013-1-5 10:15 , Blair Zajac wrote: > I got some feedback from the Munki people [1] and it honors any number > of integers in a version number, so to ensure that packages and > metapackages will support epoch without issue, I put in the epoch number > into the generated filenames and internal version number.
Hm, I don't think it's always desired to have the epoch in the filename, e.g. for base releases. Maybe the epoch and revision could be left out when they are 0? - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
