On 01/05/2013 01:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

On Jan 5, 2013, at 15:32, Rainer Müller wrote:

Also, what about a different separator for the epoch to avoid confusion?
Writing the example above as foo-1_3.2.0_0.pkg would be easier for
recognition by humans.

I approve of that, since we already use underscore to separate version from 
revision; makes sense to then also use underscore to separate epoch from 
version.

The existing code does this.

It seems unfortunate to make the epoch user-visible at all, since a handful of 
ports have large unsightly epochs. :/

True, but it's good those are rare.

Blair

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to