On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 09:50, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Revision: 102239
>>         https://trac.macports.org/changeset/102239
>> Author:   [email protected]
>> Date:     2013-01-29 07:50:15 -0800 (Tue, 29 Jan 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> pairs: correct license and suppress license conflict with openssl
>> 
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>>   trunk/dports/kde/pairs/Portfile
>> 
>> Modified: trunk/dports/kde/pairs/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/kde/pairs/Portfile  2013-01-29 15:48:46 UTC (rev 102238)
>> +++ trunk/dports/kde/pairs/Portfile  2013-01-29 15:50:15 UTC (rev 102239)
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>> version             4.9.5
>> categories          kde kde4
>> maintainers         nicos openmaintainer
>> -license             GPL-2+
>> +license             {GPL-2+ GPL-3+}
> 
> How is that different?

Hello, 

The main point of the commit was to add
> +#Binaries do not link to openssl, nor use the ssl backend of kdelibs4
> +license_noconflict  openssl

Then, the license correction indeed does not change anything in practice, but 
as the choice is explicitly given, I changed it for the sake of completeness. 
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to