On 2013-1-30 13:16 , Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 09:50, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> -license GPL-2+
>>> +license {GPL-2+ GPL-3+}
>>
>> How is that different?
>
> Hello,
>
> The main point of the commit was to add
>> +#Binaries do not link to openssl, nor use the ssl backend of kdelibs4
>> +license_noconflict openssl
>
> Then, the license correction indeed does not change anything in practice, but
> as the choice is explicitly given, I changed it for the sake of completeness.
I'd say it's actually {GPL-2 GPL-3} at present:
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
# published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
# the License or (at your option) version 3 or any later version
# accepted by the membership of KDE e.V. (or its successor approved
# by the membership of KDE e.V.), which shall act as a proxy
# defined in Section 14 of version 3 of the license.
Obviously there is no possible difference until there's a GPL-4, but at
that point GPL-2+ would be incorrect if KDE e.V. does not accept the new
version.
{GPL-2+ GPL-3+} is redundant in any case since it's exactly equivalent
to GPL-2+.
- Josh
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
