On Oct 9, 2013, at 21:45, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 2013, at 19:38, [email protected] wrote: > >> Revision: 112027 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/112027 >> Author: [email protected] >> Date: 2013-10-09 17:38:07 -0700 (Wed, 09 Oct 2013) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> metis: correct license and formatting >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile 2013-10-09 23:20:45 UTC (rev 112026) >> +++ trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile 2013-10-10 00:38:07 UTC (rev 112027) >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ >> categories math >> platforms darwin >> maintainers nomaintainer >> -license Apache-2.0 >> +license Apache-2 LGPL-2.1+ > > The metis LICENSE.txt says: "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0". > It does not say "or later" or "Version 2.x", so how do we know that any > version 2 is ok? How do we know there won't be an Apache license version 2.1 > in the future that has different terms? When I've found projects licensed > under the Apache License version 2.0 I've tried to list them in the portfiles > as "Apache-2.0". Oh I see in the ticket you referred to http://guide.macports.org/#reference.keywords which says any ".0" should be omitted. So that means "Apache-2" means the same as "Apache-2.0". I had incorrectly thought "Apache-2" would mean "Apache-2.x". And this means we have no syntax for indicating that a project would be under "Apache-2.x"? _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
