On 2013-10-10 13:45 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 19:38, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Revision: 112027
>>          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/112027
>> Author:   [email protected]
>> Date:     2013-10-09 17:38:07 -0700 (Wed, 09 Oct 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> metis: correct license and formatting
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>>    trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile 2013-10-09 23:20:45 UTC (rev 112026)
>> +++ trunk/dports/math/metis/Portfile 2013-10-10 00:38:07 UTC (rev 112027)
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>> categories          math
>> platforms           darwin
>> maintainers         nomaintainer
>> -license             Apache-2.0
>> +license             Apache-2 LGPL-2.1+
> 
> The metis LICENSE.txt says: "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0". 
> It does not say "or later" or "Version 2.x", so how do we know that any 
> version 2 is ok? How do we know there won't be an Apache license version 2.1 
> in the future that has different terms? When I've found projects licensed 
> under the Apache License version 2.0 I've tried to list them in the portfiles 
> as "Apache-2.0".

2 means 2.0 not 2.x. Keeping the .0 will break checking for license
conflicts.

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to