Josh, > Probably not just go ahead and call it LGPL-2 (which makes us distribute > it). You could ask the developers for clarification.
I’ll do that right away. > Most of the files are now LGPLv2 or later in the new version you just > committed. However the viewer still says GPL-3+, as do the examples, and > the included CGAL headers are GPL-3+ or LGPL-3+. (The tests are also > GPL-3+ but tests usually aren't installed.) >>> The license name and version need to be separated by a dash. >> >> You mean a hyphen ‘-’ or a real dash ‘—’? > > ASCII 45. Yep, that’s what I did. I apologize for being a little pedantic. > BTW, the port now has redundant name and version lines, and the case of > the parent dir does not match that of the name. Oh, I know. But I thought a capitalized name would look terrible; what’s your opinion? Vincent _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
