> On Sep 14, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Revision: 125359 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/125359 >> Author: khindenburg at macports.org >> Date: 2014-09-14 10:53:12 -0700 (Sun, 14 Sep 2014) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> gtimelog: add license - only reference is to GPL >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> trunk/dports/x11/gtimelog/Portfile >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/x11/gtimelog/Portfile >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/dports/x11/gtimelog/Portfile 2014-09-14 17:44:50 UTC (rev >> 125358) >> +++ trunk/dports/x11/gtimelog/Portfile 2014-09-14 17:53:12 UTC (rev >> 125359) >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >> name gtimelog >> version 0.8.1 >> categories x11 >> +license GPL > > When a project has an ambiguous license statement like this, we can't > just take a guess at what they meant. Maybe they meant you may choose > any version of the GPL, which is what you used. But it's equally > possible that they meant GPLv2 only. If they included a copy of the GPL > with the program, you could at least infer that that version is allowed. > But they haven't in this case. So the license must remain unknown > until/unless clarification is found. > > Fortunately this port is probably considered non-distributable either > way, so no harm done.
The latest version explicitly mentions GPL 2. https://github.com/gtimelog/gtimelog/blob/master/COPYING We should update the port. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39710 _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
