On Wednesday January 28 2015 09:21:46 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > What variants did you select when installing llvm-3.4 and clang-3.4? If you > installed with +assertions, that would certainly by why you see differences.
The standard variant for llvm, to have binary packages, and apparently a locally built clang to skip the arm_runtime. As far as I can tell that didn't include assertions. I can no longer compare clang-3.4 and clang-mp-3.4, but I'll see if I find a moment to repeat the comparison with clang-3.5 . How long approximately to build clang-3.5 without that arm runtime, on a 2*2 core 2.7Ghz i7 MBP? > > So I've wondered: would it be possible to provide the missing components > > from the current Apple toolchain through a port, so that one can build 3rd > > party software against that toolchain? kdev-clang wouldn't be the only > > "client" to benefit: one can also think of 3rd party debugger front ends, > > etc. > > No. > Would it at least be possible to expand on that. In other words, why? R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
