On Mar 3, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios <j...@macports.org> wrote: > The approach I suggested wouldn’t change layout in any way. apache2 would be > obsoleted and replaced by apache22, which would be the exact same port as the > previous apache2. Parallel to that, apache24-devel would be obsoleted and > replaced by apache24, which again would be the exact same port as the one > it’s replacing. This would create suite of Apache ports similar to what we > now have for MySQL, i.e. mysql51, mysql55, mysql56, etc.
I don't think there's a compelling need to keep apache22 around. If there is, I think it's reasonable to have apache2 be the upstream recommended apache 2 (2.4.x) I would just remove apache24-devel and upgrade the apache2 port to 2.4.x > So both ports would essentially just be renamed, preserving everything about > them. Do you guys see a problem with that? I could do it if you don’t…. -- Daniel J. Luke _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
