> On 7 Oct 2016, at 8:08 pm, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote: > >> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Christopher Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On 7 Oct 2016, at 7:40 pm, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Chris Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> Currently, once they find out about svn, and trac >>> >>> We will still use Trac for issue tracking, although I believe someone is >>> looking into integrating GitHub sign in. >> >> Personally I think we have to migrate away from trac as well. Pull >> requests in GitHub will largely replace what happens in trac for >> submission of patches and the discussion of them. If we stick with >> trac for issues then for me it will be an utter mess. > > We will not be migrating to GitHub Issues in its current form. Several > of us (not me) have already evaluated it as a possible Trac replacement > and concluded that it is insufficient for our needs.
OK… I predict a lot discussion will naturally start to happen associated with the pull requests, as that will be the most natural place to discuss them, so I think this decision will need to be re-assessed at some ... Chris > > vq
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
