On Nov 1, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote:
> While I agree in principle that our committing should not be hampered by
> the buildbot and would welcome another solution, I'm not crazy about the
> idea of polluting our (permanent!) commit history with transient
> administrivia like this.

A tag that indicates 'This commit was part of a mass change' (that doesn't 
change the build product) doesn't seem like pollution in the commit history to 
me, but I don't really care too much.

I imagine this could also be handled 'manually' by someone who could 
temporarily disable the build infrastructure, make the mass change, and then 
bring the build infrastructure back up.

Daniel J. Luke

macports-dev mailing list

Reply via email to