> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:48 PM, Clemens Lang <c...@macports.org> wrote: > >> * Using the same change methods as outside contributors may help to >> develop better PR flow.
I am not particularly interested in accommodating contributors' workflow expectations for their own sake. Their workflows may work for them but not for us. >> Currently I see some lack of the standard flow, maintainers commit >> contributors' changes in different ways, PRs marked as rejected >> while they're actually merged, people ask to enable "Allow edits >> from maintainers" for PR, etc. > > Absolutely agree. I think this is mainly us trying to figure out a good workflow. I expect things will settle down eventually. >> * Ability to get a feedback / review from other project members. > > Agree for the cases where other people interested in the ports and > capable of reviewing exist, and those people have the time to review in > a timely fashion. Sure. I would encourage committers who want feedback to open as many PRs as they want. (You get a PR! You get a PR! Everybody gets a PR!!!) vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev