Hi, Is it necessary to use a revbump when fixing a port for binary distributability?
For example: https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.7_x86_64_legacy-watcher/builds/4522 doesn't upload any archives because the binary already existed (that's partially on my request, so if anything, I'm to be blamed as well :) The port uses a GPL3+ licence and calls ghostscript at runtime (it doesn't link with it or anything) and ghoscript uses a GPL2-licenced libpaper for something (I didn't investigate what exactly). So I guess there is no issue with a licence conflict. Mojca
