> On Jan 31, 2017, at 03:29, Mojca Miklavec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it necessary to use a revbump when fixing a port for binary > distributability?
It isn't supposed to be necessary but you've found a bug in how we're excluding ports from being built on the buildbot... > For example: > > https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.7_x86_64_legacy-watcher/builds/4522 > > doesn't upload any archives because the binary already existed (that's > partially on my request, so if anything, I'm to be blamed as well :) > > > The port uses a GPL3+ licence and calls ghostscript at runtime (it > doesn't link with it or anything) and ghoscript uses a GPL2-licenced > libpaper for something (I didn't investigate what exactly). So I guess > there is no issue with a licence conflict. > > Mojca
