By providing a current clang, like 5.0, all these are covered I believe. 

The PG is really misnamed....should be "modern compiler" PG or similar. 

K

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
> 
> The cxx11 portgroup is fine for C++11, but what do we want to do about C++14, 
> C++17, and future versions?
> 

Reply via email to