On Feb 4, 2018, at 18:01, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> The cxx11 portgroup is fine for C++11, but what do we want to do about >> C++14, C++17, and future versions? > > By providing a current clang, like 5.0, all these are covered I believe. > > The PG is really misnamed....should be "modern compiler" PG or similar.
Well, for example, Apple clang < 602 doesn't understand -std=c++14, but the portgroup only blacklists clang < 500. So for C++14 ports like textmate2 I've been adding the clang < 602 blacklist in addition to including the portgroup. But the more new C++ standards get introduced, the more complicated this will get.