> On 28 Jul 2022, at 5:21 pm, Chris Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On 28 Jul 2022, at 5:17 pm, Mark Brethen <mark.bret...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> ~ $ cd
>> /opt/local/var/macports/build/_Users_marbre_ports_cad_CalculiX/CalculiX/work/CalculiX/cgx_2.18/src
>> src $ sudo ack DrawCommandLine
>> Password:
>> cgx.c
>> 5009: DrawCommandLine(keystroke, strlen(keystroke)+curshft);
>> 5071: DrawCommandLine(keystroke, strlen(keystroke)+curshft);
>> 5799: DrawCommandLine(0,0);
>> 5803:void DrawCommandLine(char *string, int curpos)
>> 5807: printf(" in DrawCommandLine\n");
>> 5874: DrawCommandLine(0,0);
>>
>> cgx.h
>> 588:void DrawCommandLine(char *string, int curpos);
>>
>> parser.c
>> 85: DrawCommandLine(keystroke, strlen(keystroke)+*curshft);
>>
>>
>> cgx.h has 'void DrawCommandLine(char *string, int curpos);’
>>
>> cgx.c has '#include <cgx.h>’
>>
>> parser.c has '#include <extUtil.h>’ only
>>
>> should I add '#include <cgx.h>’ to parser.c or add 'void
>> DrawCommandLine(char *string, int curpos);’ to extUtil.h?
>
> Based on the above, no, but instead add it to parser.c
Apologies, misread your reply. I would say yes to the first part.
>>
>> Mark Brethen
>> mark.bret...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2022, at 8:41 PM, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's only one -Wimplicit-function-declaration warning in the log, so it
>>> doesn't look like there's a lot that needs fixing. Just say yes to function
>>> prototypes. :)
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>
