Re: include files for cgxCADTools

Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:05:52 -0700

I have a stub that installs the documentation files and both subports but I get these warning messages. How should I fix?

The following dependencies will be installed: 
 CadReader
 FbdReader
Continue? [Y/n]: 
--->  Fetching distfiles for CadReader
--->  Verifying checksums for CadReader
--->  Extracting CadReader
--->  Applying patches to CadReader
--->  Configuring CadReader
--->  Building CadReader
--->  Staging CadReader into destroot                    
--->  Installing CadReader @1.1_0
--->  Activating CadReader @1.1_0
--->  Cleaning CadReader
--->  Fetching distfiles for FbdReader
--->  Verifying checksums for FbdReader
--->  Extracting FbdReader
--->  Applying patches to FbdReader
--->  Configuring FbdReader
--->  Building FbdReader
--->  Staging FbdReader into destroot                    
--->  Installing FbdReader @1.1_0
--->  Activating FbdReader @1.1_0
--->  Cleaning FbdReader
--->  Fetching distfiles for cgxCADTools
--->  Verifying checksums for cgxCADTools
--->  Extracting cgxCADTools
--->  Configuring cgxCADTools
--->  Building cgxCADTools
--->  Staging cgxCADTools into destroot
Warning: violation by /libexec
Warning: cgxCADTools violates the layout of the ports-filesystems!
Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior (if it is intended), it will be an error in future releases!
ports $ 

Attachment: Portfile
Description: Binary data


Mark Brethen



On Aug 4, 2022, at 1:19 PM, Mark Brethen <[email protected]> wrote:

I’m seeing this error when generate all the header dependencies for FbdReader. This is confusing, which file has the error?

:info:build In file included from Point.cpp:In file included from In file included from 1In file included from Element2d.cppFbdReader.cppSeqa.cpp:::1:
:info:build In file included from ../../FbdReader/inc/FbdReader.hxx:
:info:build :127:
:info:build 2In file included from :
:info:build In file included from ../../FbdReader/inc/FbdReader.hxx::
:info:build 27:
:info:build In file included from /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepBuilderAPI_MakeWire.hxxIn file included from ../../FbdReader/inc/FbdReader.hxx../../FbdReader/inc/FbdReader.hxx:27:In file included from ::
:info:build 24In file included from :
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepBuilderAPI_MakeWire.hxx:/opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:1762427/opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepBuilderAPI_MakeWire.hxx:
:info:build In file included from ::
:info:build 81: error/opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepBuilderAPI_MakeWire.hxx: :a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')24
:info:build :24/opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:
:info:build :176:/opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx81::176 :error81: :a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >') 
:info:build error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build                                  NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL);
:info:build                                                                                 ^~
:info:build                                                                                 > >
:info:build                                  NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL);                                 NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL);
:info:build                                                                                 ^~:
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:176                                                                                ^~:
:info:build 81                                                                                > >:
:info:build  error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build                                                                                 > >
:info:build                                  NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL);
:info:build                                                                                 ^~
:info:build                                                                                 > >
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:178:79: error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:  void CreateNewVertices(const NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL, 178
:info:build :                                                                              ^~79
:info:build :                                                                              > > 
:info:build error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build   void CreateNewVertices(const NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL, 
:info:build                                                                               ^~
:info:build                                                                               > >
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:178:79: error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build   void CreateNewVertices(const NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL, 
:info:build                                                                               ^~
:info:build                                                                               > >
:info:build /opt/local/include/opencascade/BRepLib_MakeWire.hxx:178:79: error: a space is required between consecutive right angle brackets (use '> >')
:info:build   void CreateNewVertices(const NCollection_List<NCollection_List<TopoDS_Vertex>>& theGrVL, 
:info:build                                                                               ^~
:info:build                                                                               > >


Mark Brethen



On Aug 3, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Mark Brethen <[email protected]> wrote:

I solved the build issue I was having with CadReader. I now have a different problem with FbdReader using opencascade 7.6:

:info:build  :../../FbdReader/inc/FbdReader.hxx:1074:: 74fatal error:: 'GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx' file not found
:info:build fatal error10:10: fatal error: 'GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx' file not found
:info:build : 'GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx' file not found
:info:build #include <GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx>
:info:build          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:info:build #include <GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx>
:info:build          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:info:build #include <GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx>
:info:build          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:info:build  fatal error: 'GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx' file not found
:info:build #include <GeomAdaptor_HCurve.hxx>
:info:build          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I found this in the release notes:

Upgrade to OCCT 7.6.0

Simplification of surface/curve adaptor

Interfaces Adaptor2d_Curve2d, Adaptor3d_Curve and Adaptor3d_Surface now inherit Standard_Transient and can be Handle-managed. No more necessary parallel hiererchy of classes Adaptor2d_HCurve2d, Adaptor3d_HCurve and Adaptor3d_HSurface (generated from generic templates by WOK) has been eliminated. Existing code using old Handle classes should be updated to:

  • Rename occurrences of old names (remove H suffix); upgrade.bat could be used for that purpose.
  • Replace redundant calls to previously declared methods .GetCurve2d()/.GetCurve()/.GetSurface() with the common operator->() syntax.
  • Pay attention on code calling GetSurface()/GetCurve() methods of removed handle classes. Such places should be replaced with Handle dereference.
I'll try patching the source. 

Thanks,
Mark
Mark Brethen



On Aug 3, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Mark Brethen <[email protected]> wrote:

It turns out the headers were their, I just didn’t have access due to a permissions setting on the ‘inc’ directory itself. There are quite a few undefined symbols listed in the build log.



Mark Brethen



On Aug 3, 2022, at 2:21 AM, Mark Brethen <[email protected]> wrote:

I confirmed the bzip file contains the header files, however, the files are missing in the workpath. And there is nothing unusual in the log to explain what happened.

<main.log>


Mark Brethen



On Aug 2, 2022, at 6:20 PM, Robert Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:

Mark,

I was able to spend more time with your Makefile.  I corrected some typos.

Attached is the FINAL Makefile Rev 4 along with the patch file (that will patch the original Makefile)

It should work well for your purposes.

If you are having trouble with the extraction phase, please send me a copy of your Portfile and I will take a look.  It can be frustrating when things do not unpack as expected.\\

Rob

From: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 4:51 PM
To: Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Cc: MacPorts Developers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
I found the issue: There should be header files in ‘${workpath}/cgxCadTools/CadReader/inc’ but for some reason the extract phase is omitting them, i.e. the ‘inc’ directory is empty.

Why would it be doing this?


Mark Brethen



On Aug 2, 2022, at 2:52 PM, Robert Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:

I missed one.  You also need to change:

$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -o $(MAIN) $(OBJS) $(LFLAGS) $(LIBS)

to

$(CCX) $(LDFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -o $(MAIN) $(OBJS) $(LFLAGS) $(LIBS)

Rob
From: Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 3:46 PM
To: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
Mark,

Since it is a C++ project (not a C project), I modified the Makefile accordingly. See attached.

Please note that I added LDFLAGS = -stdlib=libc++ and added $LDFLAGS to the Makefile target that does the linking.

This is needed so the code will link properly on older macs (like my old Mac running Lion).

Alternatively, you could add the following to the Portfile:
configure.ldflags-append    "-stdlib=${configure.cxx_stdlib}"

Rob

From: Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
I forgot to mention that I normally change all the CFLAGS and LDFLAGS as follows:

CFLAGS = blah blah
CFLAGS += blah blah

This will allow Macports to add its own flags.

You do not need to do that with CC or CCX.

Rob
From: Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 3:00 PM
To: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
Mark,

I could not get the patch file to patch the Makefile.  So I manually applied the patches.  And added my changes.  

Attached please find the FINAL Makefile and a patch file showing all the diffs (including yours) from the original Makefile.  

I also did the following:
  1. Deleted all the dependencies, generated by makedepend below the "# DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE -- make depend needs it" line.
  2. Added "macports" to .PHONY  (P.S.  PHONY targets provide rules that do not directly build or link real binary objects.  They call on other targets that build and link the actual code).
  3. Added the "macports" target:
  4. macports:   depend all  
The rule for the Macports target is:

macports:   depend all  

When make macports is run, it will first run the "depend" target in the Makefile and generate all the header dependencies and then it will run the "all" target to build and link the code.

Now you have two choices as far as Macports is concerned:
  1. Just use the Makefile as is and see if the code builds and links.  It likely will unless you are missing a header directory in $(INCLUDES).  OR
  2. Add the following to the Portfile which causes makedepend to run (which will generate all those dependencies) before compiling and linking the code:
    1. depends_build       port:makedepend
    2. build.target        macports
If the Makefile is doing all the building and linking for your Project, you should probably also add the following to the Portfile:

PortGroup           makefile 1.0

I am working with a similar Makefile.  Both approaches above work for me.  Approach 1 runs a lot faster since it does not call on makedependto generate all those header dependencies (which can take some time for a large project).  And as mentioned in my previous posts to the Macports mailing list, the compiler typically does NOT need to know about these header dependencies to properly build and link the final binary product for the first time.  

But the compiler does need to know the location of all the directories where all the non-system headers can be found so when it processes an #include in a source file, it can find the needed header.  The $(INCLUDES) does not need to contain any of the directories where the system headers are located since the compiler knows where they are.  And as you found out, the location of the system headers will change from MacOS to MacOS.

I went with Approach 1 for my project.

P.S.  It looks like the project is using autotools or cmake to generate the Makefile so you likely need to patch the Makefile at the end of the configure stage or before building.  The most important thing is deleting all those header dependencies at the end of the Makefile.

Good Luck.

Rob


From: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
Rob,

There is the line '.PHONY: depend clean' but 'make all’ only calls $(MAIN). 

Thanks,
Mark



On Aug 2, 2022, at 9:34 AM, Robert Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:

Mark,

To be clear, I would first try patching the Makefile by deleting all the system header dependencies from the Makefile and then see if  Macports will build the project.  But make sure the Makefile lists the location of all the directories where the header files are located.  (I typically place them in $(INCLUDES)).  And make sure the rules contain $(INCLUDES).

You typically do not need to list the directories of the system header files because  the compiler typically knows where they are (which as you know may change from MacOS to MacOS).

If you want to know why, keep reading....

Typically "make" only needs to know the following to build the initial Project from scratch:
  1.  The rules that define what source code files are needed to build each object and a rule for linking the object files and the location of the directories for the header files (e.g. main.h).  
e.g

         INCLUDES := -I./ 

.PHONY all

         all:  edit
   
edit:  main.o kdb.o
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o main.o kbd.o

         main.o: main.c myfunc.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c main.c myfunc.c

kbd.o: kbd.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c kbd.c


In the example above, the directories of the header files are in listed in $(INCLUDES).   

You do not need to list the directories of the system header files in $(INCLUDES) because the compiler knows where they are (which as you know may change from MacOS to MacOS).

Ideally, if you know that a particular header is a dependency for an object, it is better to list it in the rule (e.g.  main.o:  main.c myfunc.c main.h)  OR create a separate rule for the header dependency:

main.o:  main.h

But these header dependency rules are typically not needed to build the initial project from scratch!  These rules exist so "make" will only rebuild the minimum number of objects when a header file has changed.

E.g.  If I change header.h and then run "make all" again in the above example, make will only recompile main.o and then it will link main.o with the previously built kbd.o.  kbd.o does not need to be recompiled.  This saves time.  Great for development!

Macports does not do this.  It typically will rebuild the whole project from scratch. (i.e. build all the objects and then link them into the final product).

In my view, Macports was not designed for development but for building a finished project and making a binary package.  (i.e. package management)

If you are still having problems, please EMAIL me the Makefile and I will take a look.

RobK88
From: macports-dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
Sent: August 2, 2022 8:10 AM
To: Mark Brethen <[email protected]>; MacPorts Developers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
Mark,

I agree with Josh, these headers look like they were automatically generated using something like "make depends".  

When creating a Makefile, it is GOOD practice to include these lines as it will ensure that the Project will rebuild the correct files when a header file was changed.  Since it is a REAL pain to create them manually.  Many developers use something like "make depends".

If there is a "depends:" target in the Makefile, you could patch the Makefile and add "depends" as the first Phony target to the "all:" target.  e.g.  

all:  depends main etc etc

Alternatively, you could try just patching the Makefile by removing all these lines (and any other line where a system header is the ONLY dependency in the rule).  The vast majority of time, they are NOT needed to build the initial project.  (They are needed if you want to use "make" to rebuild your project properly on subsequent runs where the developer has changed one of more of these system header files.  This is not a normal scenario if one is using Macports to build the project).

The most important rules are the rules involving the source code files (which must be kept).  
e.g.  $(OBJDIR-MAIN)/%.o: %.c
      $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c $< -o $@

Make sure the Makfile has an "INCLUDES:" that lists the location of all the header files.  If it does, make will find them and build the initial project!

e.g. I am working on a new port where I converted an Xcode project to one using a Makefile.  I used "make depends" to generate these dependencies, Macports built the code just fine when I either:
  1. Deleted all the lines below "# DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE -- make depend needs it"; or
  2. Added "depends" as the first phony target to the all: phoney target 
e.g. all: depends utils altivec mpeg2enc main $(PRODUCT)

You could even patch the Makefile and add another target called "macports" and tell Macports to build that:

      macports:  depends all

      And in the portfile, you would add:

build.target        macports

Good luck,

Rob


From: macports-dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Brethen <[email protected]>
Sent: August 1, 2022 8:51 PM
To: MacPorts Developers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: include files for cgxCADTools
 
I’ll ask the developer

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 1, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> A lot of them aren't even standard headers; I believe the ones under bits/ are glibc implementation details. I would suspect this part of the Makefile was not hand-written but generated with one of the compiler's -M options. To work correctly in that case, it would need to be regenerated for each new system the software is built on.
> 
> - Josh
> 
>> On 2022-8-2 05:23 , Chris Jones wrote:
>> The makefile here is very poorly written. You should never directly reference standard headers like that…
>>>> On 1 Aug 2022, at 4:52 pm, Mark Brethen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This Makefile has the following lines:
>>> 
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/stdlib.h /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/features.h /usr/include/stdc-predef.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h /usr/include/bits/wordsize.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/long-double.h /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/waitflags.h /usr/include/bits/waitstatus.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/floatn.h /usr/include/sys/types.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types.h /usr/include/bits/typesizes.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/clock_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/clockid_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/time_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/timer_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/stdint-intn.h /usr/include/endian.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/endian.h /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/byteswap-16.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/uintn-identity.h /usr/include/sys/select.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/select.h /usr/include/bits/types/sigset_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/__sigset_t.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timeval.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timespec.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h /usr/include/bits/sysmacros.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/thread-shared-types.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes-arch.h /usr/include/alloca.h
>>> CadReader.o: /usr/include/bits/stdlib-float.h
>>> 
>>> /usr/include doesn’t exist on Big Sure (I assume its deprecated?) however, they can be found at
>>> 
>>> ~ $ xcrun --sdk macosx --show-sdk-path
>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX12.1.sdk
>>> 
>>> although I don’t see a ‘bits’ subdirectory. Has it been relocated?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>

<Final-Combined-Makefile-Patches - Rev 2.diff><Makefile FINAL-Rev4>





Reply via email to