Le 19 oct. 07 à 22:45, paul beard a écrit :
On 10/19/07, Lenore Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(No. Bottom posting is harder to read. The reader must scroll past
all the stuff already read to get to new content.)
You are supposed to remove the stuff that isn't relevant:
bottom-posting provides context so a complex topic can be understood
BEFORE commenting.
Why isn't pear (is that the source of the perl5.8 ?) going to be
broken by having its version of the file overwritten with the one
gimp wants?
The file should be the same, no? What would break?
--
Paul Beard / www.paulbeard.org/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Some p5-* ports need to overwrite perl5.8 port to upgrade its core
modules.
This does not break anything. Don't worry, be happy.
--
Anthony Ramine, the infamous MacPorts Trac slave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
