On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > On 19.08.11 17:25, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >>> Unfortunately, there's no ticket number in the r13165 commit log, so a >>> quick look doesn't show exactly what the build problems were. IIRC the >>> private includes were installed into a normal search directory and some >>> configure script found one or more of them. > i still believe this is a bug in that package. Tcl TEA build system works > fine with multiple installations since many years, packages should use TEA > and not use their own searches. btw., if the package making troubles is a tcl > extension, then loading this package into the tcl installed from macports, it > will likely crash. >> Incidentally, the expect port is an example you can use to pull the already >> downloaded tcl source and have your build use its private headers. > This looks easy enough (attached is the modified port file). I am not sure, > what's the best way is to submit the changed portfile. Should i create a > ticket on https://trac.macports.org/report or is this ignored in case there > is no maintainer...
Open a trac ticket with Keywords "haspatch nomaintainer", add the port name to the Port field, and attach a unified diff patch file (diff -u) to the ticket. Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
