On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:40, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:18 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:41, Dave Curtis wrote: >>> >>>> I'm willing to give it a shot, but I'll need a clue or two. >>>> If I make the dependencies py-foo instead of py27-foo then they should be >>>> satisfied by the py27 components on my system, correct? >>> >>> Yes. >> >> >> Wait, really? If py-foo is a stub that depends on py27-foo, wouldn't >> requiring py-foo just cause the installation of py27-foo? > > I misread Dave's message. Nobody should be declaring any dependencies on > py-foo stub ports. Always declare dependencies on the specific version you > want (py26-foo, py27-foo, etc.).
OK. Agreement all around. Yay! So... does that mean there *should* be py26-spe and py27-spe, etc, ports? In any case, I can easily try a quick tweak of the existing port, which appears to be "py26-spe" and see if "py27-spe" magically works. -dave _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
