On Mar 22, 2012, at 18:34, Dave Curtis wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:40, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> >>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:18 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:41, Dave Curtis wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm willing to give it a shot, but I'll need a clue or two. >>>>> If I make the dependencies py-foo instead of py27-foo then they should >>>>> be satisfied by the py27 components on my system, correct? >>>> >>>> Yes. >>> >>> >>> Wait, really? If py-foo is a stub that depends on py27-foo, wouldn't >>> requiring py-foo just cause the installation of py27-foo? >> >> I misread Dave's message. Nobody should be declaring any dependencies on >> py-foo stub ports. Always declare dependencies on the specific version you >> want (py26-foo, py27-foo, etc.). > > OK. Agreement all around. Yay! > > So... does that mean there *should* be py26-spe and py27-spe, etc, ports?
No. Spe is not a python module. Spe is a program that happens to use python. There is and should only be a single port called "spe". _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
