On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org>wrote:
> > I think we require base/ changes if only because there won't necessarily > be a portfile for each perl module yet there are going to be ports that > depend on some of these modules (so we would need a way to handle that). > > Yes, base would need to be changed to accommodate this new feature. But I > see it as a minimal shim onto calling this other package manager. > Are we reinventing bsdpan? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users