On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org>wrote:

> > I think we require base/ changes if only because there won't necessarily
> be a portfile for each perl module yet there are going to be ports that
> depend on some of these modules (so we would need a way to handle that).
>
> Yes, base would need to be changed to accommodate this new feature. But I
> see it as a minimal shim onto calling this other package manager.
>

Are we reinventing bsdpan?

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com                                  ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to