On 07 Dec 2014, at 20:07 , René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: > For now it's just the same as qt5-mac but installed to a different location.
Awesome! > But yes, rolling our own version has the advantage that we can do things our > way, introduce any required patches that are more or less KDE specific (and > could "break" things in qt5-mac, such as deactivation of the menurole > guessmatism), and not depend on the qt-mac maintainer. Or rather, > maintainers: I noticed qt4-mac and qt5-mac are not maintained by the same > person, which probably doesn't help the concurrency thing… Yes, you are absolutely right. This is a much better position for use KDE guys on MacPorts. But perhaps this can feed itself back to the original qt*-mac ports, once you’ve shown how it could work. Fantastic! P.S.: Cross-posting this now also to MP-user, although I think this discussion should be lead on MP-devel, René! _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
