On Sunday December 07 2014 14:35:37 Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > So your solution to having two QT ports with two different maintainers is to > add a third QT port with a third maintainer?
As Marko said, this could feed into and ultimately merge with the original ports. For now, the only things I have changed are the install paths in the PortGroup definition file. If that's indeed all that's needed the merger would be very simple, possibly even based on a variant (or the original, mutually-exclusive set-up could go into a variant). Or we might decide to go for subports, though the complexity of the Portfiles as they are seem to make that a recipe for endless annoyances. R. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
