On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote:
> That would break other ports that depend upon netpbm. Worse, I think port > will > automatically re-activate it, if it comes to such a port. > I would hope those are only upgraded *after* netpbm itself --- and using a port that has a `port upgrade` scheduled against it is a dicey proposition no matter what. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
