On 12 Jun 2015, at 22:08, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote: > That would break other ports that depend upon netpbm. Worse, I think port will > automatically re-activate it, if it comes to such a port. > > I would hope those are only upgraded *after* netpbm itself --- and using a > port that has a `port upgrade` scheduled against it is a dicey proposition no > matter what.
I am puzzled and a little worried about the part of your sentence after '---'. Does it mean that once I know a port upgrade is needed I should do it before any other computing work? I usually do other things alongside an upgrade. Barrie. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
