I agree, but “better license” has nothing to do with that, does it ? My point is we should look at the best technical solution, and THAT should be the only factor. Anything else is ancillary.
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:52 AM, <wood...@gmail.com > <mailto:wood...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I don’t believe a “better license” should be the dictating factor, I believe > what should dictate what is included is what has better functionality. This > is politics, and TBH is not a technical reason for inclusion or exclusion. > TBH, I believe the only dictating factor should be technical, what does the > job best, period. Everything else is ancillary. Something could have a much > better license and be total crap. > > For many people, being able to get binary archives instead of always having > to build from source is rather more than just "politics". > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates > allber...@gmail.com <mailto:allber...@gmail.com> > ballb...@sinenomine.net <mailto:ballb...@sinenomine.net> > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net > <http://sinenomine.net/>
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
