But in this case, I don’t see one, openssl has been fine being distributed the way it is, its just that some people want a new-shiny here.
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM, <wood...@gmail.com > <mailto:wood...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I agree, but “better license” has nothing to do with that, does it ? > > It is the license that blocks binary distribution, with specific exemptions. > Oddly enough, licenses are not merely political noise; they actually have > practical ramifications that need to be considered. > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates > allber...@gmail.com <mailto:allber...@gmail.com> > ballb...@sinenomine.net <mailto:ballb...@sinenomine.net> > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net > <http://sinenomine.net/>
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
