> On Sep 11, 2016, at 4:13 AM, David Epstein <david.epst...@warwick.ac.uk> > wrote: > > For those few interested in this thread, and who have not followed so far, > the relevant line of output from > “port select —summary” was >> llvm none mp-llvm-3.5 none > > I think that this is a either a bug in “port select —summary” or a > misinterpretation of the output from > “port select —summary”. > > In contrast, here is what “port installed” thinks: >> port installed mp-livm-3.5 > gives >> None of the specified ports are installed.
Port names and select entries need not match. The "mp-llvm-3.5" select entry corresponds to the "llvm-3.5" port. vq _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
