On 11 Sep 2016, at 14:41, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote: > >> On Sep 11, 2016, at 4:13 AM, David Epstein <david.epst...@warwick.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> For those few interested in this thread, and who have not followed so far, >> the relevant line of output from >> “port select —summary” was >>> llvm none mp-llvm-3.5 none >> >> I think that this is a either a bug in “port select —summary” or a >> misinterpretation of the output from >> “port select —summary”. >> >> In contrast, here is what “port installed” thinks: >>> port installed mp-livm-3.5 >> gives >>> None of the specified ports are installed. > > Port names and select entries need not match. The "mp-llvm-3.5" select entry > corresponds to the "llvm-3.5" port. > > vq
Thanks for clearing up my misconception/misinterpretation of the output from “port select —summary”. Is there a port command that would have given me this information? David _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
