On 2018-09-07, at 5:20 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I guess the real problem is that xattr is not a dependency on almost any >> system, and so it should not come into the list when you look for the rdeps. >> >> That sounds like a base bug. > > What, specifically, do you think the bug is? > > Are you saying that you don't want rdeps to include bin or lib dependencies > that are already satisfied? Why would that be good? > > The bug would be that xattr is put forward as an dependency on systems where it is not needed. ie port echo rdepof:wine-devel +x11 +universal should not list "xattr" as a dependency on any system other than 10.4. Ken
