Hi, Thank you both for the answers. In the end I ended up using Ryan's command that excludes xattr and that worked perfectly.
Thanks again! Regards, Gijs Op za 8 sep. 2018 om 02:54 schreef Ken Cunningham < [email protected]>: > > On 2018-09-07, at 5:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > I understand that you are saying that, but I'm not convinced that's > desirable behavior. > > > > What criteria do you propose to use to exclude the dependency? The > dependency is written "bin:xattr:xattr". Do you propose to exclude all bin > (and lib?) dependencies? Or do you only propose to exclude bin (and lib?) > dependencies that are already satisfied by the specified program (or > library?)? And if so, do you exclude the dependency regardless of how the > dependency was satisfied, or only if the dependency was satisfied by a file > outside of MacPorts? And if the latter, where in MacPorts base should that > determination be made? (As far as I know, MacPorts base doesn't currently > care where the file that satisfies a bin (or lib) dependency is located.) > > > > Whew -- might take me a while to digest all that. > > In essence, I think most users would expect that: > > port echo rdepof:wine-devel +x11 +universal > > would lead to more or less the same dependencies being listed as would be > installed if you instead did: > > port install wine-devel +x11 +universal > > But if that is not desirable behaviour for some reason, OK. I actually > don't use rdepof. > > Best, > > Ken
