Ken Cunningham wrote: >> Bootstrapping 3: >> (5) & (7) : >> the instructions state +llvm39 ; >> but shouldn't it be +llwm37 ?!? > > The instructions state +llvm50 (I changed them from llvm39 about a week ago, > in anticipation of llvm-3.9 being retired) > My bad ;-) I've just had the page open in a tab for the last week or so while I played around, so I hadn't seen your recent changes ;-) :-P -- Bjarne D Mathiesen Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- denne besked er skrevet i et (næsten) M$-frit miljø MacOS X 10.13.6 High Sierra ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Chris Jones
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 ... Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 ... Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 1... Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: LibcxxOnOlderSystems Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: LibcxxOnOlderSystems Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Bjarne D Mathiesen
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Ken Cunningham
- Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow Bjarne D Mathiesen
