Like Jordan said :) Please file a ticket and we will get this fixed in 0.9. Bugs breaking applications are considered as a priority.
I think 0.9 should remain 32/64 bits, but the release after may drop 32-bit support (unless people really need it). I can add a note in the 0.9 release notes and then we can see if people complain. Laurent On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Fair enough, I did not realize that you'd already deployed an app based on > MacRuby and had already received bug reports (which suggests that the number > of 32 bit users is clearly non-zero, at least!). Have you filed a ticket in > trac with a reduction (e.g. the minimum code necessary to demonstrate the > problem) yet? That will allow us to track and prioritize the work for > possible inclusion in 0.9 (or later, depending on how things go). > > Thanks, > > - Jordan > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Richard Sepulveda wrote: > >> That makes perfectly good sense but i unfortunately started selling a >> MacRuby app on the App Store >> for i386 and 64 bit machines. And a few people are experiencing this issue. >> I was just hoping >> for a quick workaround to make them happy. And I would discontinue selling >> the 32 bit version >> on the next release. >> >> But i can't see anything obvious other than rewriting all of my NSDate based >> code in Objective-C or >> waiting for a fix. i include the MacRuby framework in my Pkg so that is >> possible. >> >> Richard >> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:08:38 -0800 >>> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <j...@apple.com> >>> To: "MacRuby development discussions." >>> <macruby-devel@lists.macosforge.org> >>> Subject: Re: [MacRuby-devel] Strange NSDate behavior building 32 bit v >>> 64 bit >>> Message-ID: <d31ef44c-06f8-45b1-83b4-7977a32bd...@apple.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>> >>> I suppose this begs the question: Does anyone really *require* 32 bit >>> support for MacRuby at this point? SnowLeopard is already the minimum >>> supported config, and the only Intel 32 bit-only platforms (very early >>> MacBook and Mac Mini configurations) are several years old now. I don't >>> want to sound like an unfeeling ogre to anyone who actually has such a >>> configuration, mind you, but how big of an installed base does this really >>> represent? >>> >>> - Jordan >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Vincent Isambart wrote: >>> >>>>> 1. Modified the Valid Archetectures to "i386 x86_64" >>>> >>>> There's a simple way to run macruby (or any other program) on the >>>> command line in 32 bits: just add "arch -i386" before the name of the >>>> program to execute: >>>> $ macruby -v >>>> MacRuby 0.9 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, x86_64] >>>> $ arch -i386 macruby -v >>>> MacRuby 0.9 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, i386] >> _______________________________________________ >> MacRuby-devel mailing list >> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
